Scalable QA and Testing Process for Your Startup MVP
On this page
Introduction
Being honest, during the construction of an MVP, Quality Assurance is not always on your list of things to do. Most likely you are thundering to meet deadlines, product-market fit tests, and, perhaps, even raise funds all at the same time. On a lean budget, it is tempting to make QA something that you will sort out later. However, it is the reality of the matter that should your MVP be buggy, broken, or frustrating to operate, you might not have a second opportunity to fix things. Customers demand easy experiences and startups are evaluated by their initial launch. Sacrificing QA can be compared to sacrificing brakes in a race car, you may be fast, but you will not go too far. The good news? There is no need to have a QA department or costly automation platforms. All you require is a lightweight strategy that fits in your current stage and expand your product. The guide will take you through all that you will need to know to establish that process including methods and tools in testing and smart strategies that scale.
Creating a basic, scaling software testing and quality assurance process at the beginning is among the most intelligent steps that you may take.
The reason why QA is important to MVPs
The idea behind your MVP is to launch fast and learn fast. However, the point is that, in this case, your MVP should be functional. A basic product is fine. A broken product is not. Your best users are early adopters. They will provide feedback, will be promoters of your product, and will assist in creating your roadmap. However, when your application crashes during the login process or your onboarding process is faulty, they will go away and they will never come back. It makes you have the confidence that you can use, demo and scale your product.
Real Impact: What QA Really Provides
- Faster iteration: When bugs are identified at a young age, your developers have to spend less time in fire fighting
- Higher-quality feedback: QA makes sure that users are able to go through the flows and give constructive feedback
- Minimal re-work: It is 4-5 times more expensive to fix a bug after launch than before launch
- Improved investor perception: That is the last thing people want to present a buggy app to VCs
- Better morale in the team: Developers like to create new stuff rather than to go and fix bugs that were not spotted two sprints ago
MVP Challenges no QA
To analyze what happens when you do not conduct QA at all, first let us look at what happens when the user encounters a broken flow:
- User drop-off: Fickle flows will send users away before you even get feedback
- Debt changes to tech debt: Problems get cumulative, and the next stage of development becomes more challenging
- Team stress: Team developers are constantly on the reactionary level rather than the planning side
- Slow growth: Buggy products find it difficult to take off or attract money
Yes, QA is time-consuming, but it is more costly than not.
Software Testing Process: Scaling to MVP Teams
Simple enough. Each feature could have dozens of tests which would be run by a full QA department. In the case of MVPs, you simply need to prioritize on what is important. The following is an abridged software testing process, which you can get on with immediately:
1. Requirement Validation
Before you develop anything, you want to know that it has:
- Clear
- Testable
- Aligned with user value
You do not know what it means by a feature to be a success, how will you determine when it works?
2. Creation of Test Plan
There is no need to be a genius about it, a Google spreadsheet is sufficient at this point. List:
- Features that we would want to test
- Test steps
- Expected results
You can even crowdsource this with your team. User flows can also provide the developers, designers, even PMs with test cases.
3. Test Execution
This is the stage where you execute the product. Preferably, this is done by a person who did not write the code (since he/she is more apt to see what is missing or broken). Test:
- End-to-end flows (e.g. sign up to onboarding to core action)
- Edge cases (e.g., what happens when I leave a required field blank?)
- Several gadgets or browsers (at least Chrome and Safari)
4. Bug Tracking
You do not require elaborate systems. Use:
- Trello - lightweight (also visual), great if your team already uses it
- GitHub Issues - better when you already have a team
- Jira - applicable when you are working in sprints
Each bug is supposed to contain the steps to reproduce it, screenshots, and priority.
5. Regression Testing
Once bug is fixed or some new feature is added, re-test the critical paths. This will prevent that annoying "we have fixed one problem and broken another" cycle.
Start Your QA Process Today
Don't wait for bugs to derail your MVP launch - implement these testing fundamentals now.
Contact UsTest scope MVPs vs Full Products
Just make sure it works. Manual vs Automation Testing
| MVP Level | Full Product Level | Why This Difference? |
|---|---|---|
| Critical flows only | Test everything | Focus on what matters most |
| No pixel-perfect design testing | Comprehensive UI testing | Users care about functionality first |
| No accessibility audits | Full accessibility compliance | Build foundation, add layers later |
| No performance benchmarking | Detailed performance testing | Ensure basic functionality works |
| Basic device testing | Cross-platform compatibility | Cover major user scenarios only |
Manual vs Automation Testing
What is most appropriate to MVPs? This question comes up a lot. And it's totally valid. Manual testing is easy to initialize. No installation, no programming, and your product, your checklist, and a human being running in it. On the other hand, automated testing timesaves in the long run but proves to be more time consuming as far as implementation is concerned. So, what's right for you?
In the early days, use Quality Assurance Manual Testing
Manual testing is your bible. Why?
- It is quick to run
- You can edit test cases quickly as features change
- Visual or UI tests
You can use the Quality assurance manual testing will be particularly useful in live demonstrations, pre-launch testing, and user interviews.
When Automation Makes Sense
As a startup, you have a stable MVP and you have:
- Shipping weekly or daily
- Maintaining a consistent user flow
- Scaling your dev team or user base
You should write testable code even before you write full automated test suites. Adopt the uniformity of structure and modularity to avoid the need to refactor in order to make use of it later.
Open-source Automation Testing Tools to Startups
Here are some of the available, inexpensive automation testing tools that can be of interest:
Selenium
The original open-source browser automation framework. Multitasking in various languages and browsers. Applications: Teams that require flexibility and cross-browser restriction.
Cypress
A modern, easy-to-use tool that is in-browser. JavaScript-based and simple to write, read and maintain. Best in: Teams which are creating SPAs based on frameworks such as React or Vue.
Playwright
Open source, written by Microsoft, and based on Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit. Tests modern web apps without any difficulties. Best: More complicated web testing requirements, such as mobile emulation.
Postman
Not only can automatic API checks be done with the collection runner and the monitors at Postman, but also not only on manual testing of APIs. Best when: API-first teams or heavy-weight apps.
TestRail
Excellent when it comes to organizing test cases, test results, and test runs. Best: Founders or PMs, who desire to see what is being tested.
How to Select the appropriate testing stack
You do not need to have all these. Actually, send me less and I get more when I am beginning. Ask:
- What's our stack? (JavaScript? Python? Something else?)
- What do we need to test? (Web UI? APIs? Backend logic?)
- What's our release cadence?
- Who's writing the tests?
Choose tools that do not adversely affect your team.
How to create a Lean QA Strategy That Scales
You have got your tools and your test plan. It is time now to develop a strategy that is not only good today but can be expanded tomorrow.
1. Include QA to Your CI/CD
Use GitHub Actions, GitLab CI or CircleCI to run simple tests on each push. Even when it is simply a few sanity checks, it develops good habits.
2. Write Reusable Test Cases
Each time you test one flow you should then make that a repeatable test case. Store it in a Notion document or TestRail. In this manner, you do not have to begin with nothing per sprint.
3. Prioritize What to Automate
- Signup
- Core dashboard actions
- Login
- Payments
These are the things that you will test each sprint. Automate them early in life so that they become easier.
4. Review QA Every Sprint
On the completion of every sprint, ask:
- What broke?
- What did we miss?
- What is better automatable or documentation?
QA is not merely a test it is a learning and an improvement of the way your team delivers software.
Last considerations: QA as a Growth Enabler, Not a
Scalable QA process will help you develop faster, detect issues early and make costly mistakes. It transforms initial user reactions into the product development and makes your team confident enough to implement updates on a schedule. Thinking of QA as a component of your MVP, as opposed to a side project, is what will enable you to create something that people trust, investors admire, and developers enjoy working on. Wait not until your application crashes or your original users have been driven away. Don't be afraid to scale because the quality of what you are building is part of it right at the start.
Tags
Introduction
Being honest, during the construction of an MVP, Quality Assurance is not always on your list of things to do. Most likely you are thundering to meet deadlines, product-market fit tests, and, perhaps, even raise funds all at the same time. On a lean budget, it is tempting to make QA something that you will sort out later. However, it is the reality of the matter that should your MVP be buggy, broken, or frustrating to operate, you might not have a second opportunity to fix things. Customers demand easy experiences and startups are evaluated by their initial launch. Sacrificing QA can be compared to sacrificing brakes in a race car, you may be fast, but you will not go too far. The good news? There is no need to have a QA department or costly automation platforms. All you require is a lightweight strategy that fits in your current stage and expand your product. The guide will take you through all that you will need to know to establish that process including methods and tools in testing and smart strategies that scale.
Creating a basic, scaling software testing and quality assurance process at the beginning is among the most intelligent steps that you may take.
The reason why QA is important to MVPs
The idea behind your MVP is to launch fast and learn fast. However, the point is that, in this case, your MVP should be functional. A basic product is fine. A broken product is not. Your best users are early adopters. They will provide feedback, will be promoters of your product, and will assist in creating your roadmap. However, when your application crashes during the login process or your onboarding process is faulty, they will go away and they will never come back. It makes you have the confidence that you can use, demo and scale your product.
Real Impact: What QA Really Provides
- Faster iteration: When bugs are identified at a young age, your developers have to spend less time in fire fighting
- Higher-quality feedback: QA makes sure that users are able to go through the flows and give constructive feedback
- Minimal re-work: It is 4-5 times more expensive to fix a bug after launch than before launch
- Improved investor perception: That is the last thing people want to present a buggy app to VCs
- Better morale in the team: Developers like to create new stuff rather than to go and fix bugs that were not spotted two sprints ago
MVP Challenges no QA
To analyze what happens when you do not conduct QA at all, first let us look at what happens when the user encounters a broken flow:
- User drop-off: Fickle flows will send users away before you even get feedback
- Debt changes to tech debt: Problems get cumulative, and the next stage of development becomes more challenging
- Team stress: Team developers are constantly on the reactionary level rather than the planning side
- Slow growth: Buggy products find it difficult to take off or attract money
Yes, QA is time-consuming, but it is more costly than not.
Software Testing Process: Scaling to MVP Teams
Simple enough. Each feature could have dozens of tests which would be run by a full QA department. In the case of MVPs, you simply need to prioritize on what is important. The following is an abridged software testing process, which you can get on with immediately:
1. Requirement Validation
Before you develop anything, you want to know that it has:
- Clear
- Testable
- Aligned with user value
You do not know what it means by a feature to be a success, how will you determine when it works?
2. Creation of Test Plan
There is no need to be a genius about it, a Google spreadsheet is sufficient at this point. List:
- Features that we would want to test
- Test steps
- Expected results
You can even crowdsource this with your team. User flows can also provide the developers, designers, even PMs with test cases.
3. Test Execution
This is the stage where you execute the product. Preferably, this is done by a person who did not write the code (since he/she is more apt to see what is missing or broken). Test:
- End-to-end flows (e.g. sign up to onboarding to core action)
- Edge cases (e.g., what happens when I leave a required field blank?)
- Several gadgets or browsers (at least Chrome and Safari)
4. Bug Tracking
You do not require elaborate systems. Use:
- Trello - lightweight (also visual), great if your team already uses it
- GitHub Issues - better when you already have a team
- Jira - applicable when you are working in sprints
Each bug is supposed to contain the steps to reproduce it, screenshots, and priority.
5. Regression Testing
Once bug is fixed or some new feature is added, re-test the critical paths. This will prevent that annoying "we have fixed one problem and broken another" cycle.
Start Your QA Process Today
Don't wait for bugs to derail your MVP launch - implement these testing fundamentals now.
Contact UsTest scope MVPs vs Full Products
Just make sure it works. Manual vs Automation Testing
| MVP Level | Full Product Level | Why This Difference? |
|---|---|---|
| Critical flows only | Test everything | Focus on what matters most |
| No pixel-perfect design testing | Comprehensive UI testing | Users care about functionality first |
| No accessibility audits | Full accessibility compliance | Build foundation, add layers later |
| No performance benchmarking | Detailed performance testing | Ensure basic functionality works |
| Basic device testing | Cross-platform compatibility | Cover major user scenarios only |
Manual vs Automation Testing
What is most appropriate to MVPs? This question comes up a lot. And it's totally valid. Manual testing is easy to initialize. No installation, no programming, and your product, your checklist, and a human being running in it. On the other hand, automated testing timesaves in the long run but proves to be more time consuming as far as implementation is concerned. So, what's right for you?
In the early days, use Quality Assurance Manual Testing
Manual testing is your bible. Why?
- It is quick to run
- You can edit test cases quickly as features change
- Visual or UI tests
You can use the Quality assurance manual testing will be particularly useful in live demonstrations, pre-launch testing, and user interviews.
When Automation Makes Sense
As a startup, you have a stable MVP and you have:
- Shipping weekly or daily
- Maintaining a consistent user flow
- Scaling your dev team or user base
You should write testable code even before you write full automated test suites. Adopt the uniformity of structure and modularity to avoid the need to refactor in order to make use of it later.
Open-source Automation Testing Tools to Startups
Here are some of the available, inexpensive automation testing tools that can be of interest:
Selenium
The original open-source browser automation framework. Multitasking in various languages and browsers. Applications: Teams that require flexibility and cross-browser restriction.
Cypress
A modern, easy-to-use tool that is in-browser. JavaScript-based and simple to write, read and maintain. Best in: Teams which are creating SPAs based on frameworks such as React or Vue.
Playwright
Open source, written by Microsoft, and based on Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit. Tests modern web apps without any difficulties. Best: More complicated web testing requirements, such as mobile emulation.
Postman
Not only can automatic API checks be done with the collection runner and the monitors at Postman, but also not only on manual testing of APIs. Best when: API-first teams or heavy-weight apps.
TestRail
Excellent when it comes to organizing test cases, test results, and test runs. Best: Founders or PMs, who desire to see what is being tested.
How to Select the appropriate testing stack
You do not need to have all these. Actually, send me less and I get more when I am beginning. Ask:
- What's our stack? (JavaScript? Python? Something else?)
- What do we need to test? (Web UI? APIs? Backend logic?)
- What's our release cadence?
- Who's writing the tests?
Choose tools that do not adversely affect your team.
How to create a Lean QA Strategy That Scales
You have got your tools and your test plan. It is time now to develop a strategy that is not only good today but can be expanded tomorrow.
1. Include QA to Your CI/CD
Use GitHub Actions, GitLab CI or CircleCI to run simple tests on each push. Even when it is simply a few sanity checks, it develops good habits.
2. Write Reusable Test Cases
Each time you test one flow you should then make that a repeatable test case. Store it in a Notion document or TestRail. In this manner, you do not have to begin with nothing per sprint.
3. Prioritize What to Automate
- Signup
- Core dashboard actions
- Login
- Payments
These are the things that you will test each sprint. Automate them early in life so that they become easier.
4. Review QA Every Sprint
On the completion of every sprint, ask:
- What broke?
- What did we miss?
- What is better automatable or documentation?
QA is not merely a test it is a learning and an improvement of the way your team delivers software.
Last considerations: QA as a Growth Enabler, Not a
Scalable QA process will help you develop faster, detect issues early and make costly mistakes. It transforms initial user reactions into the product development and makes your team confident enough to implement updates on a schedule. Thinking of QA as a component of your MVP, as opposed to a side project, is what will enable you to create something that people trust, investors admire, and developers enjoy working on. Wait not until your application crashes or your original users have been driven away. Don't be afraid to scale because the quality of what you are building is part of it right at the start.
Tags
On this page
